Shared Files from the Website of the
Orange County Chiropractic District

P.I. Alerts - Oct 2007

 

Shawn Steel
P.I. Law
CCA Affiliate Member

PI FAX & Email ALERT

10/8/2007

BY SHAWN STEEL, CHIROPRACTIC ATTORNEY

Telephone: 800-626-0003  310-697-9000
Website: www.shawnsteel.com
Email: shawnsteel@shawnsteel.com
Fax: 310-697-9010

Return to P.I. Alerts Index

Allstate Sued for 1.425 Billion

A massive civil trial in Kentucky is taking place that might bring about huge changes in the way Allstate denies and fights low impact claims [ MIST].

Plaintiffs argued that Allstate’s adjusters are trained to assume that minor impact crashes cannot possibly cause injuries.

Testimony emerged that Allstate hired McKinsey and Co to “re-design” Allstate’s claims handling, i.e. reduce payments.

McKinsey proposed a 90% - 10% rule. That 90% would settle quickly, by inducing claimants to accept paltry offers. In McKinsey’s proposal, it showed a slide of “good hands” for these claimants. For those who chose to litigate, the slide showed a pair of “boxing gloves”.

Key testimony came from epidemiologist scientist Michael Freeman, from Oregon Health and Science University that the assumptions in Allstate’s claims handling manual about how much force passengers endure in low-speed wrecks have no scientific basis. Art Croft must be joyous.

“These numbers are impossible and they are just made up” said Michael Freeman. Allstate’s manual estimated the G-force placed on passengers and the speed of a crash based on the type of property damage is significantly underestimated and scientifically impossible.

“This is obviously a bogus document.” testified Freeman.

Readers of the PI Email Alert will be kept informed about this case.

Contact JohnTawlian@shawnsteel.com
for the complete article.

Do Higher Bills make a better case?

Thanks to those of you who participated on our monthly teleconference last month. This is our 5th month and our participation is now in the hundreds.

We received many questions. But a classic question is stated above. Higher bills always bring on the litigation spotlight. There has to be a good reason for aggressive billing:

bulletAmazing visual damage
bulletPre surgical patient
bulletHigh end trauma, with ambulance and e room visits.
bulletClear, convincing and obvious injuries

Too often you might hear from some DC’s and attorneys that to guarantee a good settlement and to get paid a fair sum, you must have a large bill.

In fact, the opposite is true. High billers: always have a lot more litigation, slower payments, much greater reductions, more intrusions into their practice by attorneys, med pay denials ---ultimately starving your practice. Insurance companies do it deliberately, to the highest billers.

Do not needlessly make yourself a target of insurance carriers. Just do good work and stay in the middle of the road. Scouts are the first to get whacked.

*************************************

All DC’s Welcome
SHAWN STEEL IS SPEAKING AT:
CCA-CHIROPRACTIC DISTRICTS:
“PI Billing that gets you Paid”

Contra Costa   Oct 16, 2007
San Mateo   Nov 14, 2007
San Joaquin/Stanislaus   Dec 11, 2007
 

This web site is best viewed with
Internet Explorer 5.0 or Netscape 4.0 (or later versions)
with a screen resolution of  800 x 600.

This web site maintained by
TCVSystems.Com
For questions and comments regarding this website, please send e- mail to DrHeller@BeaHellerDC.com
Last modified: May 01, 2007
© Copyright 2001-2007 Orange County Chiropractic District - All Right Reserved
© Copyright 2001-2007 TCVSystems.Com - All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .