|
Allstate Sued for 1.425 Billion
A massive civil trial in Kentucky is taking place that might
bring about huge changes in the way Allstate denies and fights
low impact claims [ MIST].
Plaintiffs argued that Allstate’s adjusters are trained to assume
that minor impact crashes cannot possibly cause injuries.
Testimony emerged that Allstate hired McKinsey and Co to
“re-design” Allstate’s claims handling, i.e. reduce payments.
McKinsey proposed a 90% - 10% rule. That 90% would settle
quickly, by inducing claimants to accept paltry offers. In
McKinsey’s proposal, it showed a slide of “good hands” for these
claimants. For those who chose to litigate, the slide showed a
pair of “boxing gloves”.
Key testimony came from epidemiologist scientist Michael Freeman,
from Oregon Health and Science University that the assumptions in
Allstate’s claims handling manual about how much force passengers
endure in low-speed wrecks have no scientific basis. Art Croft
must be joyous.
“These numbers are impossible and they are just made up” said
Michael Freeman. Allstate’s manual estimated the G-force placed
on passengers and the speed of a crash based on the type of
property damage is significantly underestimated and
scientifically impossible.
“This is obviously a bogus document.” testified Freeman.
Readers of the PI Email Alert will be kept informed about this
case.
Contact
JohnTawlian@shawnsteel.com
for the complete article. |
Do Higher Bills make a better
case?
Thanks to those of you who participated on our monthly
teleconference last month. This is our 5th month and our
participation is now in the hundreds.
We received many questions. But a classic question is stated
above. Higher bills always bring on the litigation spotlight.
There has to be a good reason for aggressive billing:

 | Amazing visual damage |
 | Pre surgical patient |
 | High end trauma, with ambulance and e room visits. |
 | Clear, convincing and obvious injuries |
Too often you might hear from some DC’s and attorneys that to
guarantee a good settlement and to get paid a fair sum, you must
have a large bill.
In fact, the opposite is true. High billers: always have a lot
more litigation, slower payments, much greater reductions, more
intrusions into their practice by attorneys, med pay denials
---ultimately starving your practice. Insurance companies do it
deliberately, to the highest billers.
Do not needlessly make yourself a target of insurance carriers.
Just do good work and stay in the middle of the road. Scouts are
the first to get whacked.
*************************************
All DC’s Welcome
SHAWN STEEL IS SPEAKING AT:
CCA-CHIROPRACTIC DISTRICTS:
“PI Billing that gets you Paid”
| Contra Costa |
|
Oct 16, 2007 |
| San Mateo |
|
Nov 14, 2007 |
| San Joaquin/Stanislaus |
|
Dec 11, 2007 |
|